Holomua Consulting Group, LLC
info@holomuaconsulting.com
(808) 369-1471
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
    • SBA 8(a) Program Services
    • DBE Program
  • News
  • Contact
    • Initial Consultations
  • Our Blog
  • Pilot Course
  • Student Portal

​The Small Business Blog

TIPS * UPDATES * INDUSTRY NEWS

8(a) Certification: Should You Be Concerned If You Derive More than 70 Percent Of Your Revenue From a Single Source?

9/7/2017

2 Comments

 
Picture
When it comes to 8(a) certification, in short, yes you should be concerned if your company earns more than 70% of its revenue from a single client or source (commercial).  As part of the 8(a) application, applicants must provide a list of the company's contracts over the previous 12 months, including the following information: award date, customer name, description of work, dollar value and applicable NAICS code.  In some cases, during the back and forth process with the SBA that is inherent in the 8(a) application process, the SBA will request contract information for the previous 3 years.
The SBA uses this information in order to determine: (1) whether your asserted primary NAICS code is supported by your contracts; and (2) whether more than 70% of your company's revenue comes from a single customer/client, which would be indicative of economic dependence (known as the 70 Percent Rule).

Economic Dependence

Initially established through decisions issued by the SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), the 70 Percent Rule was codified in regulation last summer.  Located at 13 CFR 121.103(f), the rule says:

SBA may presume an identity of interest based upon economic dependence if the concern in question derived 70% or more of its receipts from another concern over the previous three fiscal years.  This presumption may be rebutted by a showing that despite contractual relations with another concern, the concern at issue is not solely dependent on that other concern, such as where the concern has been in business for a short amount of time and has only been able to secure a limited number of contracts.

In essence, if the 70 Percent Rule applies, and the applicant firm is economically dependent upon another firm, SBA will apply a presumption that the two firms are affiliated.  The impact of this presumption, if not adequately rebutted by the applicant, could mean one of two things, both of which would negatively effect an 8(a) application.  First, the revenues and/or number of employees for the two firms may be combined  for purposes of determining whether the applicant meets the size standard which corresponds to its primary NAICS code.  If the client firm is a large business, a finding of affiliation could render the applicant business to be other than small and thus not eligible for the 8(a) program.  

Second, and often more problematic is that the SBA may find:  (1) that the client firm has the ability to negatively control the applicant by exerting financial leverage over the applicant firm; and/or (2) that the economic dependence negatively impacts the applicant firm's potential for success because an applicant that relies on one client is unstable and risky, given the high probability that should that one client leave, the applicant may be unable to continue its operations.

Now, if the 70 Percent Rule applies, that means the SBA will presume economic dependence between the firms.  It is then up to the applicant firm to rebut the presumption by providing evidence that the applicant is not solely dependent upon the client firm.   To date, the only arguments SBA has accepted in order to rebut the presumption are:
​
  • The applicant is a startup and has only been able to secure a limited number of contracts;
  • The applicant's operations recently started up again after a period of dormancy and it has only been able to secure a limited number of contracts; and
  • As of the date of the size determination, the applicant is no longer economically dependent upon the client firm (i.e., the applicant just received another large contract or several smaller contracts which would reduce the level of dependency to below 70 percent).

A Court of Federal Claims decision issued on August 2 may impact whether the SBA will accept other arguments/factors to rebut the 70 Percent Rule, but we will have to wait and see on that, as the SBA should now be in the process of reconsidering its prior decision in that case, pursuant to the Court's order.   

Bottom Line

If you are considering applying for the 8(a) program now or in the future, we encourage you to take a careful look at your contracts over the past few years and determine whether the 70% rule may be of concern for your application.  If it is in fact a concern and: (1) your firm is not a "startup"; (2) your firm did not recently resume operations after a period of dormancy; (3) your firm has not recently obtained contracts/revenue from other sources that would reduce the level of dependency to below 70 percent; and/or (4) there is no other compelling explanation for the economic dependence on the single client firm, we would recommend against submitting an 8(a) application at this time.  Rather, we would recommend that you focus your energy on putting together a business development strategy for pursuing and securing new sources of revenue.

The bottom line is that contrary to what you may hear, not every issue can be overcome when it comes to the 8(a) application process, which is why the success rate for 8(a) certification is so low.  Absent one of the circumstances described above, the 70 Percent Rule will rule you out almost every time (no pun intended).

If you have questions about the 70 Percent Rule, 8(a) eligibility requirements or the application process, feel free to contact us at info@holomuaconsulting.com or by scheduling an initial consultation with us.



Schedule Initial Consultation
2 Comments
Gino Ceron link
2/6/2019 12:45:22 pm

Company name is Norec Inc.

Would like to schedule an initial consultation. My cell # is: 305-619-6717

Thanks,
Gino

Reply
Elisabeth Southgate link
10/4/2019 11:45:09 am

Thank you for helping me learn more about the 70% rule. It is interesting how if this rule applies, it will equate firms as being affiliated. I can see how business will want to know when and how this rule will apply to them.

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014


    Categories

    All
    8(a) BD Program
    Affiliation
    Affirmative Action
    Business Development
    Compensation
    Conferences
    Contractor Compliance
    DBE
    DFARS
    Employment
    Events
    FAR
    Federal Contracting
    FLSA
    GAO Protest
    General Business Tips
    GovCon Tips
    Government Contractor Compliance
    HR Compliance
    HUBZone
    Joint Ventures
    Marketing
    Market Research
    Native Hawaiian Issues
    NHO
    OFCCP
    Ostensible Subcontractor Rule
    SBA OHA Decisions
    SBA Regulations
    SBIR
    SDVOSB
    Size Protests
    Small Biz Tools
    Small Business Compliance
    Small Business Programs
    Subcontracting
    WOSB

CONTACT US

  • (808) 369-1471
  • info@holomuaconsulting.com
  • P.O. Box 29735, Honolulu 96820

    Newsletter, alerts & updates, promotions

Subscribe
Back to top
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
    • SBA 8(a) Program Services
    • DBE Program
  • News
  • Contact
    • Initial Consultations
  • Our Blog
  • Pilot Course
  • Student Portal
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
© 2014 Holomua Consulting Group, LLC.  All Rights Reserved.