Holomua Consulting Group, LLC
info@holomuaconsulting.com
(808) 369-1471
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
    • SBA 8(a) Program Services
    • DBE Program
  • News
  • Contact
    • Initial Consultations
  • Our Blog
  • Pilot Course
  • Student Portal

​The Small Business Blog

TIPS * UPDATES * INDUSTRY NEWS

SBA OHA lacks Jurisdiction to Determine "unfair competitive advantage" for purposes of affiliation determination for entity-owned firms

8/20/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
On July 28, 2016, the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) issued a decision in the matter of:  Size Appeal of: The Emergence Group.  This appeal arose out of The Emergence Group's (Appellant) size protest of Olgoonik Federal, LLC (OF), the awardee of a contract for professional, administrative and support services with the Department of State.  
Appellant, an unsuccessful offeror took the position that OF, a wholly-owned subsidiary of an Alaska Native Corporation (ANC) was other than small due to its affiliation with the Olgoonik family of companies which received a combined $200 Million in federal contracting dollars in 2015.  Specifically, Appellant argued that OF (presumably due to its relationship to the Olgoonik family of companies) has obtained or is likely to obtain a substantial unfair competitive advantage within an industry category and should not be considered a small business.

Affiliation Generally

In general, and according to SBA regulations, affiliation exists when one business has the power to control another or when a third party (or parties) controls or has the power to control both businesses.  Control may arise through ownership, management, or other relationships or interactions between the parties. 13 CFR 121.103 provides the general bases upon which affiliation may be found.  For example affiliation may be found based on:
  • Common ownership or management
  • Identity of interest
  • Newly organized concern
  • Joint ventures
  • Ostensible subcontractor
  • Franchise and license agreements


Exceptions to Affiliation for Tribes, Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs)

As many readers know, 13 CFR 121.103(b) as well as the specific regulations pertaining to entity-owned firms provide for very broad exceptions to the general affiliation rules for entity-owned firms.  For example, affiliation generally will not be found between a Tribe/ANC/NHO and its subsidiaries or between the subsidiaries themselves based on common ownership or management.  There is also an exception to affiliation when an entity (or entities)  provides common administrative services to its sister companies, but we can discuss that more detail in a later post.

Of relevance to this particular situation is the unfair competitive advantage exception.  Although the specific regulation quoted below applies to NHOs, there is an identical provision for Tribally-owned and ANC-owned companies.  13 CFR 124.110 pertaining to NHOs provides, in pertinent part:

"SBA will determine the concern's size independently, without regard to its affiliation with the Native Hawaiian Organization or any other business enterprise owned by the Native Hawaiian Organization, unless the Administrator determines that one or more such concerns  owned by the Native Hawaiian Organization have obtained, or are likely to obtain, a substantial unfair competitive advantage within an industry category."  

SBA's July 28, 2016 Final Rule Addresses Substantial Unfair Competitive Advantage

As part of the most recent SBA regulatory changes, SBA sought to clarify how "substantial unfair competitive advantage" is determined.  Although SBA's office of general counsel has long taken the position that "substantial unfair competitive advantage" is based on a national basis rather than on a local basis, they took the opportunity to document this in regulation.  The following language has therefore been added to the regulations for each of the entity-owned categories:

"In determining whether an NHO-owned concern has obtained, or is likely to obtain, a substantial unfair competitive advantage within an industry category, SBA will examine the firm's participation in the relevant six digit NAICS code nationally.  (1) SBA will consider the firm's percentage share of the national market and other relevant factors to determine whether the firm is dominant in a specific six-digit NAICS code with a particular size standard.  (2) SBA does not contemplate a finding of affiliation where an NHO-owned concern appears to have obtained an unfair competitive advantage in a local market, but remains competitive, but not dominant, on a national basis."

OHA's Decision

As mentioned, Appellant in this case argued that OF should not be considered a small business due to its relationship with the Olgoonik family of companies and the fact that OF has obtained or is likely to obtain a substantial unfair competitive advantage within the applicable NAICS Code.

OHA's decision in this case was very straightforward.  They declined to render a decision in this case based on the fact that OHA does not have jurisdiction to consider whether a company has obtained or is likely to obtain a substantial unfair competitive advantage; rather OHA stated that the regulation is explicit that the only person that has authority to make that determination is the SBA Administrator and OHA has not received delegation from the Administrator in that regard.  The lesson learned here is that the exceptions to affiliation for entity-owned firms remains strong and only the SBA Administrator has the authority to determine substantial unfair competitive advantage (unless or until such time as the Administrator delegates that authority).


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.


    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014


    Categories

    All
    8(a) BD Program
    Affiliation
    Affirmative Action
    Business Development
    Compensation
    Conferences
    Contractor Compliance
    DBE
    DFARS
    Employment
    Events
    FAR
    Federal Contracting
    FLSA
    GAO Protest
    General Business Tips
    GovCon Tips
    Government Contractor Compliance
    HR Compliance
    HUBZone
    Joint Ventures
    Marketing
    Market Research
    Native Hawaiian Issues
    NHO
    OFCCP
    Ostensible Subcontractor Rule
    SBA OHA Decisions
    SBA Regulations
    SBIR
    SDVOSB
    Size Protests
    Small Biz Tools
    Small Business Compliance
    Small Business Programs
    Subcontracting
    WOSB

CONTACT US

  • (808) 369-1471
  • info@holomuaconsulting.com
  • P.O. Box 29735, Honolulu 96820

    Newsletter, alerts & updates, promotions

Subscribe
Back to top
  • Home
  • About
  • Services
    • SBA 8(a) Program Services
    • DBE Program
  • News
  • Contact
    • Initial Consultations
  • Our Blog
  • Pilot Course
  • Student Portal
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
© 2014 Holomua Consulting Group, LLC.  All Rights Reserved.